home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM!taumet!clamage
- From: Casey Muratori <cmu@netcom.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Q: pure virtual destructors
- Date: 19 Apr 1996 14:43:39 GMT
- Organization: Northwest Link
- Approved: clamage@eng.sun.com (comp.std.c++)
- Message-ID: <3176D10D.2B4C@netcom.com>
- References: <4kere7$qmm@netlab.cs.rpi.edu> <4kguil$592@netlab.cs.rpi.edu> <4l0gut$r8q@netlab.cs.rpi.edu> <4l1bmi$1li@netlab.cs.rpi.edu> <4l4v5s$eke@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: taumet.eng.sun.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: port45.annex3.nwlink.com
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
- X-Lines: 21
- Content-Length: 654
- Originator: clamage@taumet
-
- Chris Page wrote:
- >
- > In article <4l1bmi$1li@netlab.cs.rpi.edu>, sachs@fnal.fnal.gov wrote:
- >
- > > Personally, I consider virtual destructors to be one of the blemishes
- > > of the C++ language. There should be a better way to make a class
- > > (with no other pure virtual functions) abstract.
- >
- > How about an "abstract" keyword that you can place before "class"?
-
- Hmmm. If the class has no pure-virtual functions, why would you want
- to make it "abstract"? If all you want to do is prevent someone from
- instantiating an object of its type, simply make the constructor private,
- no?
-
- - Casey
-
- --
- "Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free."
-
-
-
-
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: try just posting with ]
- [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
- [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]
- [ Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
- [ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]
-